The best fit for the Pfizer data we have at hand is that significant fraud occurred in the recruitment process for the trial. Otherwise, we’re supposed to believe that a single site recruited as “few” as 4,501 patients and possibly as many as 4,501 + 1,275 = 5,776 in an extreme five-week burst right before the FDA deadline.
The Argentinian doctor involved has more conflicts of interest than most, which is saying something.
Remember, the entire “rationale” for the vaccines rested upon the measured 95% “vaccine efficiency” (or VE) and the promise that they would prevent people from getting serious Covid.
But, there’s now strong evidence the trials were anything but properly blinded, raising the prospect that the results were inadvertently (at best) skewed or even rigged.
The trials utterly failed to detect any serious adverse events, which is now being challenged by real-world data, such as that from Germany noting actual adverse events are 40x what they’ve been officially told by their version of the FDA (i.e. the PEI).
So. we now see some scrambling and revisionism by the authorities and the self-proclaimed authorities such as Bill Gates. They are trying to re-write the story to fit their culpable and complicit actions to make them seem as if they were simply doing the best they could under difficult circumstances.
We can’t let them get away with this.
Finally, the same brand of ineptitude – or maliciousness – is now on display in how the west, or G7, is responding to Russia. If you thought double masks without data was bad, just wait until you see what happens when these G7 geniuses legislate themselves out of Russian energy supplies.
Hello dark ages! will be the new rallying cry of Europe. Or perhaps just crying.
from Peak Prosperity https://ift.tt/A9IZltb
